this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
271 points (99.6% liked)

Linux

48404 readers
1200 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1984 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

As long as their goals suite the company, sure. The endgame of Google is very clear and it doesn't include a free and open web.

[–] haerrii@feddit.org 10 points 2 months ago

they are making it seem just free and open enough to avoid regulation

[–] drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't even think this is the case, google does a lot pretty much everywhere. one example is one of the things they are pushing for is locally run AI (gemini, stable diffusion etc.) to run on your gpu via webgpu instead of needing to use cloud services, which is obviously privacy friendly for a myriad of reasons, in fact, we now have multiple implementations of LLMs that run locally in browser on webgpu, and even a stable diffusion implementation (never got it to work though since my most beefy gpu is an arc a380 with 6gb of ram)

they do other stuff too, but with the recent craze push for AI, I think this is probably the most relevant.

[–] that_leaflet@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

LLMs are expensive to run, so locally running them saves Google money.

[–] drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

ehh... not really, the amount of generated data you can get by snopping on LLM traffic is going to far out weigh the costs of running LLMs

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

I doubt that. I'm going to guess that Google is going towards a sort of "P2P AI"

[–] that_leaflet@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

There's nothing technical stopping Google from sending the prompt text (and maybe generated results) back to their servers. Only political/social backlash for worsened privacy.