this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)

City Life

2113 readers
6 users here now

All topics urbanism and city related, from urban planning to public transit to municipal interest stuff. Both automobile and FuckCars inclusive.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
Butterbee@beehaw.org
aponigricon@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
12
Half of Uber, Lyft Trips Replace More Sustainable Options (www.ucdavis.edu)
submitted 2 months ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/citylife@beehaw.org
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, the study analyzed data collected among riders in three metropolitan regions — the San Francisco Bay Area, San Diego, and Los Angeles and Orange counties — between Nov. 2018 and Nov. 2019. The data set consisted of 7,333 ride-hailing trips by 2,458 respondents.

About 47% of the trips replaced a public transit, carpool, walking or cycling trip. An additional 5.8% of trips represented “induced travel,” meaning the person would not have made the trip were an Uber or Lyft unavailable. This suggests ride-hailing often tends to replace most sustainable transportation modes and leads to additional vehicle miles traveled.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What's the other half? People using a ride-sharing service, even though they could take their own car, just for a laugh? People foregoing use of their private jet?

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Or people who don't have a car, and there's no public transit, so it's ride share/ taxi or nothing.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Well, apparently that's only 5.8% of trips:

About 47% of the trips replaced a public transit, carpool, walking or cycling trip. An additional 5.8% of trips represented “induced travel,” meaning the person would not have made the trip were an Uber or Lyft unavailable.

I guess, maybe the remaining 47.2% are taxi rides which got replaced by Uber/Lyft?