Comradeship // Freechat

2104 readers

59 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

felipeforte@lemmygrad.ml

I finally watched that one Britmonkey video about everything banned in China after avoiding it for years, and they claim that the word "disagree" is banned on Chinese social media. (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by CPCsStrongestWumao@lemmygrad.ml to c/comradeship@lemmygrad.ml

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

He also claims that they banned the letter "N" kekw

how can anyone take these people seriously?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] idahocom@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Him having killed 4 people doesnt mean he only had 4 bullets. I dont think that needs explaning :P

I guess the topic Chinese people being killed is such an unserious matter to you that you think ":P" is an appropriate thing to use. Going mask off a little too early huh?

interviews of eyewitnesses with secondary sources.

Translation: "anonymous" sources that totally aren't made up and more bullshit with no real sources. The only named source you have is some guy who was in a hospital the whole time.

[–] poplargrove@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No the ":P" was for how I found your conclusion to be silly. Isnt it silly you didnt consider warning shots, missed shots, people shot non-lethally, not to mention people being shot multiple times? So dont get ahead of yourself.

I dont know how to express my frustration of you just making stuff up about the source and leaving it to me to correct things. If you really want to criticize the book, takes a minute to download it and verify things.

No they arent anonymous, and those are two of many. The first person was just a random soldier-turned-artist whos name I excluded because I couldnt remember. I havent read the chapter on the general, but why assume he was interviewed on the events at Tianamen and not to have him recount events of before he was removed from his post?