this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
265 points (98.2% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9539 readers
337 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

I'm curious what definition they were using for what constitutes 'ultra-processed'. I've been having a really hard time narrowing down what an ultra processed food actually is, but this isn't to take away from the study. Some researchers class them as anything with a 'non-EU GRAS' in it, some define it by number of listed ingredients or processing steps, some of them use a definition so strict that even butter or pasteurized milk counts. I think its really important that were finally seeing what the health effects of our hyperprocessed diets are having on us, but I just wish that there was a broadly accepted definition so I didn't have to look up the source study every single time to find out what they're talking about.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

The article references another article referencing this paper that gives the following definition with reference to this paper:

Ultra-processed foods are ready-to-eat/heat industrial formulations made mostly or entirely from substances derived from foods, including flavors, colors, texturizers, and other additives, with little if any intact whole food.

It seems like the last referenced paper is the deep dive: Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them.

TL;DR: It's based on the NOVA classification system.

(PS The "news" in USA is almost entirely propaganda and other capitalist trash. It's no surprise when their "science" coverage is terrible. Most of the time it's not even science.)

I wish every article that talks about "ultra-processed" foods would just link to the NOVA system or some other reference. Otherwise it just makes their statements seem so empty.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)