this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
265 points (98.2% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9539 readers
337 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 98 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How many food additives and substances have been approved in the US versus the EU

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 32 points 1 week ago

Ode To Joy intensifies

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I'm curious what definition they were using for what constitutes 'ultra-processed'. I've been having a really hard time narrowing down what an ultra processed food actually is, but this isn't to take away from the study. Some researchers class them as anything with a 'non-EU GRAS' in it, some define it by number of listed ingredients or processing steps, some of them use a definition so strict that even butter or pasteurized milk counts. I think its really important that were finally seeing what the health effects of our hyperprocessed diets are having on us, but I just wish that there was a broadly accepted definition so I didn't have to look up the source study every single time to find out what they're talking about.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

The article references another article referencing this paper that gives the following definition with reference to this paper:

Ultra-processed foods are ready-to-eat/heat industrial formulations made mostly or entirely from substances derived from foods, including flavors, colors, texturizers, and other additives, with little if any intact whole food.

It seems like the last referenced paper is the deep dive: Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them.

TL;DR: It's based on the NOVA classification system.

(PS The "news" in USA is almost entirely propaganda and other capitalist trash. It's no surprise when their "science" coverage is terrible. Most of the time it's not even science.)

I wish every article that talks about "ultra-processed" foods would just link to the NOVA system or some other reference. Otherwise it just makes their statements seem so empty.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s bread or really any seed derived foods.

[–] UnrepentantAlgebra@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep, bread isn't necessarily in the ultra-processed category but most of the common brands are.

Doesn't mean you have to stop eating bread. Reading those NOVA guidelines and comparing the foods you eat will give you a lot to think about though.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

How Ultra-Processed Bread Took Over America

https://youtu.be/NYi-7iaqmHk

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

The NOVA system is bad science, in my opinion.

When asked to classify centuries-old staples like cheese or jam or bread or pickles, the experts struggle to find a consensus on which category any given food is. And so the classification system itself is so imprecisely defined that studies based on the system will rest on a shaky foundation.

It's better to identify what specific foods and what specific cooking techniques are bad and how they might be bad, rather than trying to say that the act of chopping, blending, mixing, cooking, or fermentation automatically makes a food less healthy.

If certain additives are bad, say that those are bad. Don't try to lump in the other processing techniques into one basket.

[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Great link, thanks.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I’d go with the amount of additives compared to the “real” thing.

Like basic bread is water, yeast, flour and salt.

If your bread has 20 ingredients - it’s ultra processed.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That probably captures many such things but it's not fool proof. I like to make bread with 2-4 different kinds of flour, 4-8 different kinds of seeds, a teaspoon or two of sugar to get the yeast going, sometimes milk or olive oil or another fat source. At it's most complex it could get pretty close to 20 ingredients but I don't feel that should be classified as ultra-processed. The kinds of ingredients used and the actual process also matters.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, bread can get complicated depending on what you want to make. Excluding flour, I have in my pantry to make bread these:

  • espresso powder
  • cocoa powder (multiple varieties)
  • barley malt syrup
  • oats
  • variety of seeds (shitload of carroway mainly)
  • variety of spices
  • variety of nuts
  • variety of oils/fats (olive oil, peanut oil, ghee, sticks of butter, etc)
  • Baking powder
  • Baking soda
[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Salt is flavoring. Ultraprocessed.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Me putting ingredients into my food processor called Ultra. ULTRA PROCESSED!!

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Corpos decide a ton in this country. I hope this loophole gets fixed.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

You say loophole, I say feature, potato potato.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

The mini documentary in the article: https://youtu.be/r03hB_xk5xs