this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
40 points (93.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7213 readers
434 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

People always tell me that Biden is a communist and Bernie’s way left of him so I’m trying to figure it out myself.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

People don’t know their asses from their elbows. Liberalism has a definition, which Marxists (and still some liberal Europeans) have never forgotten, though thanks to red scare purges and two cold wars, others have forgotten. Now, in Orwellian fashion, “liberalism” and “socialism” are floating signifiers, so we have liberals like Sanders calling themselves socialists, despite never calling for abolishing private ownership of the means of production.

Wikipedia: socialism: Socialism is an economic and political philosophy encompassing diverse economic and social systems characterised by social ownership of the means of production, as opposed to private ownership.

Wikipedia: liberalism: Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on the rights of the individual, liberty, consent of the governed, political equality, right to private property and equality before the law.

“Private property,” a.k.a. “the means of production.”

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago

Socialism, democratic socialism, and socialist democrats are related ideas, complex themselves, but not the same thing as usually used in political discussions where labels are thrown around. Same with liberals, leftists, and generally the left. Everyone uses these simplified words in their soundbites, assuming the other people hearing them agree with the meanings used, and usually they are completely different. No wonder we can't agree on anything.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Where does Democratic socialism fit into that, like those shifty Canadians?

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is that a specific political party, or just a term thrown around?

Usually what people in capitalist countries actually mean is social democracy, also known as the “Nordic model”: capitalism with a social safety net.

Democratic socialism means socialism of some form or another, usually one that isn’t Marxist-Leninist. I don’t think it’s a very well-thought out term, since Marxism-Leninism follows democratic centralism.
Michael Parenti: Left Anticommunism: The Unkindest Cut

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Thanks for the information, I’ll need a bit of time to read the links before I can make an informed response.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

American politicians throw around the word "communist" as an insult because it is an easy way to leverage "communism is bad/the enemy" sentiments built up by propaganda during the cold war. Americans, overall, tend to have absolutely no idea what communism is or what socialism is. The history and definitions aren't taught in school and what is taught is simplistic and incorrect. Despite its pretenses of open investigation, Americans are heavily propagandized.

Biden and Bernie aren't that far from one another, in reality. They both support the oppressive political economic system that drives most misery and deprivation around the world and, as you can see in this post, Bernie falls in line behind Biden/Harris despite supposedly disagreeing with them. He thinks he is on their team and that it would be bad to actually oppose them in any principle, including the current genocide in Palestine that both of them support. He was also screwed over by Biden and the party twice when he ran for president and still does things like this, which tells you how committed he is to subjugsting himself to the political organs of capital.

Communism can be a term that is hard to understand because not only do Americans use it without having any idea what it means, it has been used with meaning in at least three different ways. In terms of Marxist theory, communism is a predicted way of being free of states, class, etc that comes about due to the working class controlling economic production. Communists are a particular brand of Marxists that seek to overturn the capitalist order and elevate the working class via a disciplined party structure and way of understanding the world. Finally, the concept of a communist country has often been used to describe those countries where communust revolutions succeeded and they control the state. Of course, those states cannot themselves constitute communism in the Marxist sense because they are nation-states and Marx's communism has no states.

It may also be helpful for me to talk about the term "liberal". Historically and around the world, liberalism has stood for the dominant political ideology of capitalism and is a product of capitalism. It holds that markets should be created and maintained for capitalism and tends to promote a very specific version of democracy that suits capital's interests and keeps it in control. As the dominant ideology of this domineering system, it is if course very undemocratic, particularly when it comes to destroying other countries. This is what most people around the world see as liberalism and it is what socialists criticize as liberalism. In the US, however, lineral has come to mean "arguably slightly left of center", a goalpost that of course moves around. Though often American " liberals" are very right wing and are even to the right of Republicans on many issues.

But in the usual international sense, virtually every politician in the United States is a liberal.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Though often American " liberals" are very right wing and are even to the right of Republicans on many issues.

I was following you up to this point but I don’t understand this.

Even though the democrats would be considered right of center in many countries, I can’t think of a single issue that the current GOP isn’t further right on.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

There are two ways you can think of what I said.

The first is for individual politicians. For example, there is a Democratic House member somewhat near me that is extremely nationslist and anti-China. Their Republican opponent said we need to work with China. The Dem us to the right of the Republican on that foreign policy issue.

More interesting is policies that require coordination, like at the national level. A recent example is Democrats' attempt to outflank Republicans from the right on the border. Republicans prevented the bill from passing, but it was a right wing move and beyond what the GOP has tried to pass in decades. For a successful example of this, look at the rebranding of Democrats as pro-cop. Biden has provided more funding to cops than any other politician since Reagan. The Dems' response to massive protests against racial oppression and racialized policing in particular was to make false promises about reining in the police and then massively increasing their budgets. Another example is foreign policy, where Democrats are now the option for more effective stewards of the American empire. This is why Dick Cheney, the war criminal, is announcing his vote for Harris.

Aside from rightward moves, there is a related point that is important. Virtually every policy that Democrats are "left" of Republicans on is one that they do not fight for and instead use as a campaigning tool. So their "left" stances mean very little. When American Dem voters complain about their politicians not getting things done or being incompetent, they are describing this intentional act of deceit whether they know it or not. For example, Obama's Democrats had a huge majority in Congress and the presidency and didn't force any of their platform through. Obama even announced just 3 months into his first term that codifying Roe v. Wade was not a priority despite the fact that he campaigned on it. Dems are still campaigning on abortion rights at the national level despite doing nothing about it. They didn't even try to build a sustained protest movement. They just sent their politicians to rallies and converted the outrage and enthusiasm into "vote blue", and the liberals heard that and went home.