this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
632 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9375 readers
879 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

So just build another second stadium-sized building next to the stadium sized building? (Or below it)

[–] antmzo220@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, obviously public transportation is better, but yes.

Vertical expansion is better than horizontal expansion 9/10 times.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm not arguing against that. I'm pointing out the fact that parking infrastructure is so expensive that even on high-value land you get the kind of thing in the picture. Building dense parking next to that particular stadium isn't worth it.

A stadium alone isn't enough to make a parking garage underground worth the cost of building it.

It has to already be surrounded by dense development. A train station right next to it, all that space taken up by parking instead covered in businesses, restaurants, homes, etc. Then the garage is serving way more than just the stadium and the return is massively multiplied.

Except these cities place stadiums and other points of congregation far apart from each other, specifically so there's space for the roads for everyone to drive between them. Putting vertically dense parking next to those various points doesn't solve the wasted space problem, it just makes everything way more expensive.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I used to live near Fenway Park in Boston, and one of the reasons I left was parking. It was a great location for transit and I used that for day to day stuff, but couldn’t entirely give up my car. However, even being willing to pay Boston prices for parking, everything I checked was “except during Fenway events”. I could pay ridiculous money to keep a car in, but would still have to move it for games

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

No no no. Build it ABOVE the stadium. Make it like a tower that just goes up and up and up...... And the ground level is the stadium.

It would be so ugly, and it would make me laugh so hard.