this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
622 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59629 readers
3105 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The pro upped the storage to 2TB, but I really feel like when the PS5 launched we were at the point where they should have shipped with 4TB drives.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I haven't built a new computer in awhile, but 4tb ssd would have costed more than the console when it launched would it have not? Unless you are saying they should have shipped with a hybrid SSD/HDD setup. Not sure if read/write speeds would hold up to the frame rates needed for their games now.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You can get a 4TB NVME SSD for 200 USD these days. And of course Sony wouldn't pay retail price.

2TB, what Sony went for, does appear to have (just barely) the lowest price per GB right now though. $0.48/GB vs $0.52/GB for a cheap 4TB NVME SSD.

Honestly I'm surprised they didn't also release a 4TB version. But I imagine they may release it later so they can get a second wave of PS5 Pro headlines later on.

I read it as the PS5, so launching November 2020 it should have come with a 4tb drive. The wording likely confused me

[–] jpeps@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not going to defend the Pro exactly, but out of curiosity what is your usecase for needing so much storage on a console? Multiple users? Bad Internet? I feel like I have a max of 1-3 active games at a time, and can just delete and download/install them as needed. Works just fine for me so I feel like something else must be going on.

[–] PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I have a 2TB SSD plugged into my 1TB Xbox. It's all full. Average game size is 50+ gb these days. Some games easily surpass 100gb. Even with my better-than-average 300mbps connection games can easily take over an hour to download. No fucking way I'm only keeping 1-3 games and downloading as needed.

[–] jpeps@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I guess an hour just isn't a long time to me, I don't have a lot of time to play games so I tend to plan ahead. I use the PS app to download games to my console remotely. With the numbers you're saying, are you really suggesting that you've got something like 20-40 games that you need to be able to play at a moment's notice? I'm honestly not trying to criticise I just can't relate.