AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

715 readers

509 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

DougHolland@lemmy.world

456

My body, my choice (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by DougHolland@lemmy.world to c/aiop@lemmy.world

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I think you’re going too far away from the idea of body autonomy if you get into economics of buying and selling parts of your body.

Then what IS the scope of "bodily autonomy is an essential unconditional liberty". Placing limits like economic interactions sounds like a "condition" which would be in conflict with the quote. My argument is the author's statement is too broad.

That requires something outside your body as an influence and isn’t in the same scope that the author was making.

I have no context for the quote besides the picture. If you know its context, I'd be interested.