this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
19 points (95.2% liked)

Games

1624 readers
10 users here now

█▓▒░📀☭ g a m e s 💾⚧░▒▓█

Tag game recommendations with [rec]. Tag your critique or commentary threads with [discussion]. Both table-top and video game content is welcome! Original content or indie/DRM free material is encouraged!

Not a place for gamer gate talk or other reactionary behavior. TERFs and incels get the wall.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
19
Ps5 Pro msrp prices (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by BrosephStalin@lemmygrad.ml to c/games@lemmygrad.ml
 

The console will be available only without a disc drive which has to be bought separately, same goes for the stand

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, a rare Soviet L, i guess there were troubles in tax collection during NEP, since iirc it was implemented around that point. Still, the context of this tax in socialism and capitalism is kinda different, right now indirect taxes in general are main part of overall regressive tax system (like in Poland poor people pay total around 60% tax, rich one 20-30% and richest who know how much, probably even less). And Poland for example did not had VAT in socialism.

[–] sovecon@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The reason for the VAT (in the USSR it was called a Turnover Tax. They're the same thing but a VAT does not tax means of production) was how incredibly simple it was to administer. Tax fraud could be kept relatively low for any given level of administration if a VAT was used instead of an income tax, for example. Many modern governments do this today for the same reason.

The USSR was constantly in a struggle to build an effective administration (a good book on this is Origins of the Great Purges ) while fighting what we today would call Bullshit Jobs and local strongmen.

Post-Deng China basically took a hands off approach to local strongmen and corruption skyrocketed but economic growth was heightened. The USSR was trying to mitigate markets (most of which were black markets) to prevent shortages and mismanagement in its planned economy. So the Deng approach was not something it could do. The USSR was much more developed at the time and the intricate web of an economy was more complicated than in China.