this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
959 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45728 readers
875 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Nazis were a political movement and party in WW2 Germany. The people who hate black people and Jews these days do not align at all with that party. There's actual terms like Neonazi which is rare as well, or White Supremacist. The problem with using Nazi to define anybody currently is that in most online spaces a Nazi is not somebody who wants to exterminate the Jews and create a white world, but somebody you just disagree with and think is mean.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh I'm sorry, does it hurt the feelings of neonazis and white supremacists if I call them Nazis? Thank goodness someone told me. I'll be sure to keep calling them Nazis from now on

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

It hurts the power of labeling something as Nazis when it's just somebody you don't like.

[–] bear@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I will never tire of people who do not grasp linguistics trying to be pedantic about words.

In a living language, words mean whatever people currently use them to mean. This is how "literally" literally doesn't mean "literally" anymore. Most people use Nazi to refer to both 1930s German National Socialists and modern day white supremacists. Therefore, that's what it means. English is not a dead language like Latin, so stop trying to treat it like one with regards to this one word. It just makes you look like a Nazi.

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And pro-Trump Republicans are neither of those things. There may be some white supremacists in their club but by no means is it a requirement. All I see from them is delusions and shitposting.

[–] bear@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 year ago

The entire republican party is currently lockstep saying all trans folk are trying to corrupt, if not molest, children. They're promising national legislation to oppress and punish them if they win. Before them, it was Mexicans and Muslims. They always have a group of "others" to scapegoat, and given enough time and power they always eventually act on it.

"Never again" means we're supposed to recognize and stop this behavior before it can harm anybody, not wait until it's too late as we disingenuously quibble over definitions.

[–] PaulieDied@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bah.. you can argue semantics all day long, I have no qualm calling these alt-right fucks nazis. Just look at the dumpsterfire that voat.co became. Nazis comes close enough to describe that.

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I can tell you TheDonald didn't like it either. That's why they left. The free speech absolutist policies meant they got called out all the time and they couldn't handle it.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So when men march wearing black balaclava and waving actual nazi flags, calling themselves nazis and intimidating vulnerable minorities with violence, you don't call them Nazis? Really?

Edit: This is neither hypothetical nor a unique occurrence

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

More likely neo-Nazis than actual Nazis if not pure edge lords. I think the best way to refer to them is untermensch because the actual Nazis would have seen them as lesser which I find hilarious and should insult them thoroughly. They deserve mockery and derision.

[–] animist@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Agree to disagree