this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
457 points (98.3% liked)

Funny

6578 readers
432 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 101 points 1 day ago (1 children)

US Government Employee: "Okay, awesome. So that's a solid contract for the Lunar Lander for NASA. Great doing business with you."

Northrop Grumman salesman: "Yeah, sure, happy to help us win the space race against the Soviets!"

Gov Employee: "Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go figure out who we're going to get to build a stealth bomber for the Air Force."

Grumman: "Oh, we can do that too!"

Gov Employee: "Whoa, really? Thanks, that really makes the rest of the week easier. I appreciate it! Now all I need to do is find someone to make some cute little mail delivery trucks for the USPS."

Grumman: "You're not gonna believe this..."

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just to head off any pedantry: I know this isn't how it went, but it's funnier this way.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I believe the history is Grumman made the usps trucks and then a little while after, they merged with Northrup, to make Northrup Grumman.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_LLV

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, hence the disclaimer. Grumman delivered the Lunar Module in 1968, Grumman delivered the LLV in 1986, Northrup delivered the B-2 Spirit in 1987, and the companies combined in 1994.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You didn't pay any attention to their comment trying to head off your pedantry. Did you?

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 5 points 1 day ago

I saw no pedantry, only interesting information.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

The pedantry is genuinely interesting and contributes to the conversation. It's not like *it's or something that's pedantic for the sake of being pedantic.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's wild that they actually responded to the pedantry comment with the exact pedantry I was trying to pre-empt.