this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
303 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

58138 readers
4338 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Multiple sources of production.

We learned during concentrating all of your production in one small country wasn't a good idea. Plus having multiple sources has always been suggested in case anything goes wrong with one company you can still have some production.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl -3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Sure but there are other countries that also have cheaper manufacturing rates.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Those countries probably didn't pay 5.5 billion dollars for TSMC to build a new facility in their country.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

FUCK

E: $6.6B, according to NYT

[–] mayo@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

These facilities are expensive, like 20-30B for the big ones. If you're curious youtube has some good long videos on how these places work. As far as I've checked all the gov grants given to companies as incentives (whether chips or energy or other infrastructure projects) only partially cover the costs of construction.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

And are susceptible to interference. Samsung is also building huge manufacturing infrastructure in the US.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So now it can be subject to US interference. Geopolitics folks.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

But then US interference most directly affects US jobs and customers. That’s a much better er situation.

Think of car manufacturers that have done this for decades. They may have a global supply chain, heading mostly back to their home country, but they also have worldwide plants near their customers. Thanks partly to similar incentives and tariffs, my Honda was assembled in, I think, Kentucky, and was as us-manufactured as any us brand, meaning us jobs, us manufacturing, partial us supply chain. The result has been almost entirely good.