It's not exactly a line. It's miles and miles of defensive fortifications, entrenchments, units, and supply lines in a myriad configurations. There's no breaking through it in a traditional sense. Like I said earlier, the entire doctrine of warfare is different, like how the US armed forces doctrine is based on aerial support.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, a thick line. Haven't you seen the map?

[–] Trudge@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's exactly what I'm talking about. How is that a line to break through? It's a mesh of defensive fortifications miles deep.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm not seeing a "mesh" on that map. I'm seeing a line. There's a speckling of fortifications deeper in, but a military that has broken through that line isn't going to have much trouble with a speckling. That's the "gooey center" I was talking about. The main strength is concentrated along the line.

[–] Trudge@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your own map shows fortifications all over the theater. Yes, there's more concentrated towards the front naturally. Are you talking about that?

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, that's exactly what I'm talking about. That's the thick crust of defensive lines. Once you're through that it becomes easier to move.

The whole point here is that people are complaining that the offensive is "moving slowly" and I'm pointing out that of course it's moving slowly, it has to get through the most heavily defended regions first. Once it's done that it'll move more quickly.

[–] Trudge@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, exactly. The soviet defensive doctrine is partially inefficient because they wanted the entire operational area to be hardened without a specific weak point to exploit or breakthrough. The offensive army is forced to Trudge 😉 through the entire region.