this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
153 points (98.7% liked)

Mycology

3075 readers
36 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xor@infosec.pub 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

you pay in ways other than money…
i.e. forced registration is still paywalled… (and there’s usually an article limit or some such after that)

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This mental gymnastics definition of a paywall is not widely accepted. I was pointing out a small mistake. Is my website paywalled because you need to spend electricity to access it? A paywall is one where a monetary transaction is involved to view the content; that's just what the word means.

[–] xor@infosec.pub -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

wow, i didn’t know words became immutable as soon as they’re added to wikipedia….
or that monetary compensation is the only way to pay someone….

fantabulous

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just because you dislike two things, you don't have to lump them under the same definition. Language could evolve to consider registration-required sites to have a paywall, but that would be stupid and counter to similar usages of "pay". People seem really eager to stretch negative definitions to include other things they dislike, but it's not the word that makes something bad, it's the thing itself. Two things can be different/distinct concepts and also be equally bad.

[–] xor@infosec.pub 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

just because you can’t understand things doesn’t mean you have to pretend i’m lumping things because i dislike them….

“pay” has NEVER been limited to currency… you’re just myopically capitalist….

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And you jump to ad hominem as soon as you're challenged. You should improve your conversation skills or you will flounder around and never correct inaccuracies in your beliefs. If you believe you do not have inaccuracies in your beliefs despite never changing them, you are wrong. Good luck.

[–] xor@infosec.pub 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

lol… no, you jumped to ad hominem… a word that you apparently don’t understand

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"No, you" is the best response you can come up with? Come on man.

This isn't worth my time. Blocked. I'll leave you with an acronym as a parting gift you'll find useful:

PW;DR - Paywall; Didn't Read

[–] xor@infosec.pub 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

you’re an idiot and i’m not taking this “conversation” seriously….
and “no you” because you’re literally doing the thing you’re accusing me of, not because i’m rubber and you’re glue