TheTechnician27

joined 3 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Remember, folks: always trust PP_BOY_ on Lemmy comparing SSRIs to lobotomies over the advice of a medical doctor specialized in treating mental disorders and meta-analysis after meta-analysis showing a drug class' efficacy as a front-line treatment for depression.

Incidentally, how's that global anti-intellectualism crisis going?

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 15 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

Misery, misery, misery, that's what you've chosen. I offered to read an email, and you spat in my face.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Damn bruh they really sunk Central America huh

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But then they sue the Internet Archive for hosting a library for the betterment of society. Capitalism is a plague.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"A solarpunk polity would replace centralised forms of state government with decentralised confederations of self-governing communities [...]"

Stalin notoriously loved checks notes heavily decentralizing government power akin to anarcho-communism.

"This politician writing against fascism is too fascist. This decentralized political system is too tankie. This politician ousting competent government officials he perceives as disloyal to his coup is juuuuust right."

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

It's good to see a politician who actually stays informed about these kinds of issues.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Jesus christ, chill the hell out. 💀

  1. Who still writes letters anymore? Uh... A lot of people? Especially sitting senators to massive, multi-billion-dollar corporations? Would you have preferred they go on some shitty social media platform to write "ayo get your shit together fr fr"? Fellas, is it ~~gay~~ pretentious to use your position in government to bring attention to an issue? Have you never written a letter?

  2. One of the reasons a neo-Nazi fuck just won the election is because these online spaces allow fascist rhetoric to run rampant. (Edit: probably also the general attitude that shuns literacy and intellectualism, like "writing a letter? how pretentious lmaooo") You're bringing up a nonsensical, extreme edge case to justify why action shouldn't be taken in 99.999% of cases. I also as a Hindu (a religion I'm sure you actually understand or care about) get a facial swastika tattoo and then post that as my pfp to Steam. Definitely how that really works in the actual real world.

  3. Writing coherently about an actual issue facing a platform like Steam actually shows that he's more in-touch than most politicians. You sound deeply insecure.

This entire comment oozes intellectual dishonesty.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't think you can block yourself. Maybe ask the Lemmy devs to implement it? Seriously, all I'm asking you to do is read to understand where your rights as an American citizen start and end; it's for your own good.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

A US senator can absolutely, unambiguously write to a private corporation asking them to more strictly moderate their platform. You're just parroting "muh freeze peach" having zero idea where that starts and ends.

I highly recommend informing yourself where this boundary is; even if you particularly disagree with this senator, citing the First Amendment is the weakest possible argument here except among people who also don't understand where the line is.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago

In the future, I highly recommend sourcing to Wikiquote instead. It's a sister project of Wikipedia which sources its quotes so they can be independently verified, whereas Goodreads just operates on an ad populum approach of upvotes. It also for this reason tends to be more robust to error, and many more prominent figures have specific sections both for popular quotes that are known to be misattributed and for ones that are dubious but not currently falsifiable.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/22057360

RIP Bob

Relax in peace. He's fine.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/22031243

Summary

A baby red panda named Roxie at the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland died from “stress caused by fireworks” after choking on her vomit, just days after her mother’s sudden death.

The incident, occurring around the U.K.’s Bonfire Night celebrations, has led to renewed calls for stricter fireworks regulations.

A petition with over a million signatures urging restrictions on public fireworks sales was submitted to the U.K. government.

Edinburgh recently implemented limited fireworks control zones, but animal welfare advocates argue for broader measures to prevent similar tragedies.

 
 

EDIT: Sorry, I meant to edit this post yesterday when the vote was in, but 'Ban' won. I forgot the numbers from 22:00 UTC, but the current vote (by subtracting downvotes from upvotes) is 51–40, which is pretty close to what it was yesterday. So it's not a total blowout, but it does show that most people want these types of posts banned. Thus, they will be banned for at minimum two months, and a reevaluation can (not necessarily will) be initiated on 20 January. A subsequent vote will be held to determine if we want to have Throwback Tuesdays (suggested in a DM) and/or if we want to allow "Historical" leopards (older than e.g. 15 years) while disallowing "Outdated" ones (older than 3 months and younger than e.g. 15 years).

[PLEASE READ IN FULL BEFORE VOTING]

With Donald Trump's recent reascent to the US presidency, there are likely to be a bunch of stories posted here from his first term, especially as Trump is likely to have nearly unchecked power to accomplish his face-eating compared to his first term. No matter what, there will be measures taken to address this (see the 'No ban' section), but you can vote here to determine if they will be banned altogether.

This post will be locked to ensure only the 'Ban' and 'No ban' comments are present. The one with the highest score in three days (14 November, 22:00 UTC) will be the winner. A rediscussion of the decision will not be possible until 20 January 2025, the day Trump is set to assume office. Obviously this isn't strictly a Trump community and any leopard at all is welcome and encouraged for diversity, but it goes without saying that he's the most prominent leopard right now by far.

Ban

The 'Ban' comment means that articles and other stories (e.g. social media screenshots) which are a certain amount out-of-date (this will initially be three (3) months but is subject to change) will be subject to immediate removal regardless of justification. There will be no penalty for the user other than a removal. This will apply to all posts, not just Trump-related ones, but I foresee this mostly affecting Trump posts. Should a ban be enacted, a separate measure can be voted on to determine if we should have e.g. a policy where posts more recent than three months or older than 20 years are allowed, but nothing inbetween, so that historical leopards are allowed to be showcased. For right now, I don't want to unjustly split the vote.

No ban

The 'No ban' comment means that this will not happen, namely that there will be literally no cutoff. However, a minimally intrusive measure will be taken to distinguish posts covering older stories, namely that if the story is older than three months and the story does not take place in the current year, the poster will need to indicate this in the title by prepending it with the year in brackets (e.g. '[1914] I never thought the politicians would send my children off to die!').

Voting

You're welcome and heavily encouraged to upvote the comment you want and downvote the one you don't, since otherwise there's no way to guarantee someone else won't do that and cancel your vote. Both comments combined must receive at least 50 upvotes (regardless of score accounting for downvotes) for this to be binding.

 

In my town, there's a local gardening store. I often go there by car, but recently having gotten my first commuter bike several months ago, I decided to bike there. It's a longer ride, but no big deal; I had other stops, and I only needed seed packets. I got there as they opened, and I started looking for somewhere to lock my bike. There are several dozen parking spaces and plenty of storefront, but for the life of me, I couldn't find a bike rack. Turns out there was none, so I did the next-best thing and used an out-of-the-way cart return as a makeshift rack, ran inside feeling hurried and embarrassed, bought the seeds, and left.

Instead of giving up, I emailed them talking about my intention to commute by bike when possible, my history shopping with them, why I choose them over a nearer and more bike-accessible store, my experience that day, an argument for why not only I would appreciate it but why others probably would, and how small businesses can get long-lasting, off-the-shelf bike racks for fairly cheap. Not even 90 minutes passed before I got an email which CC'd the business' management team as follows:

Hi [name]

I sincerely appreciate you taking the time to write to us with your suggestion.

We will seriously look in to the possibility of a bike rack.

And thank you for your business too. We appreciate it.

In the meantime, also feel free to lock your bike up against our long line of metal fencing located along our driveway [...] That should be reasonably secure as well.

Copying the [business name] manager team on this well [sic] to see what and where we can make this improvement.

I agree it's strictly possible that I'm being brushed off, but given bike racks can be bought off-the-shelf so cheaply, given there are neighborhoods very nearby, given they sell plenty of small goods that anyone with a bike could pick up, given they're a long-established business, and given they went so far as to CC the entire management team, I feel confident something might actually get done here. I hope this will not only let people who already want to bike there do so, but it might also give the idea to some people who don't yet.

view more: next ›