this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
150 points (98.7% liked)

Linux

5234 readers
88 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

It'd be great of this meant SR-IOV for all GPUs, but this seems like it only allows for sharing of a GPU to multiple guests. And even then, with most of the driver being on the GPU this might not help regular consumer GPUs at all (features being disabled in firmware). But I really don't know anything about what this actually means.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Even if it is minor (and like you, I don't know whether it is or not), Nvidia opening their source, even if only little by little, is probably still a good thing.

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Agreed. It seems like Nvidia is under pressure by their commercial customers for better, directly integrated open source drivers.

There is alot of demand for this kind of simplified virtualization infrastructure in the host side.

[–] emuspawn@orbiting.observer 9 points 1 month ago

Valve has moved the Linux Agenda pretty far forward. I would not be surprised if some of the pressure is from Valve's ARM based improvements. I can see why vGPU pass-through support would be desirable for certain computing applications....or just emulation.

load more comments (2 replies)