Those are all good reasons. XFCE aims to support Wayland with the next release, so if they choose to use an established compositor it shouldn't be too buggy.

With XFCE porting their apps over the setup shouldn't change much, unless you're using Xorg specific tools.

Over the last few years most features I'd expect from a windowing system were added to Wayland, so I expect the drama to cool down. (I don't even know what's still missing (except accessibility), with VRR, tearing, DRM leasing (VR), and global hotkeys being done. It's just apps like Discord that have to cave in under the pressure to fix their apps.)

Once everything works, there's no point talking about it.

@Furycd001@fosstodon.org

I wonder how long it'll be possible to build Gnome with Xorg support. If I had to guess I'd say there won't be any support within the next 3 years, because keeping future Gnome working with Xorg is work nobody wants to put in.

That said, Xwayland will likely keep being around for the foreseeable future.

Out of curiosity, do you use Xorg and if yes, what's keeping you from using Wayland?

I'm using Proxmox with a NixOS LXC for Jellyfin/*arr. The media is stored on a single btrfs HDD, because high uptime (RAID) isn't necessary for me and it's media I can simply redownload.

I'm looking into switching to NixOS on bare metal, because I don't need the UI of proxmox and most other features.

Symphonium is great for music, even though it's closed source and paid. I'm mostly using Spotify though.

Findroid is an awesome native Android app for watching tv/movies, altough it doesn't support transcoding.

Fedora also has their own flatpak remote, which only includes flatpaks build from Fedora rpms.

I'd say flatpak isn't the future because it's already here and seems to be universally accepted as the cross-distro package manager.

I do like how the Nix package manager handles dependencies, but it's not suitable for app developers packaging their own apps because of its complexity.

If a better flatpak comes around I'd use it too, but at least for graphical apps I don't know what it'd have to do to be better. In my opinion, flatpak is a prime example of good enough, but not perfect and I'd be surprised if there was a different tool with the same momentum in 15 years (except snap, but they seem too Ubuntu specific).

This post was posted two times, so you might want to delete one of them.

Bookmarks and GPX export is a great addition. OrganicMaps continues to improve and I find myself using OsmAnd less and less (unless I need specific features).

I've now added the date to the title to make it more clear the article is from two months ago. The article is a good read and wasn't posted on here, so I thought it's still worth sharing.

Yes, I've copied the title from their project.

Proxmox describes itself as an virtualization management platform.

Proxmox Virtual Environment is a complete, open-source server management platform for enterprise virtualization. It tightly integrates the KVM hypervisor and Linux Containers (LXC), software-defined storage and networking functionality, on a single platform

[1] https://www.proxmox.com/en/proxmox-virtual-environment/overview

https://www.qualcomm.com/developer/blog/2024/05/upstreaming-linux-kernel-support-for-the-snapdragon-x-elite

Spotify and Crunchyroll also require DRM, like almost all commercial video sites.

Many flatpaks are not aware of their sandbox and thus have a bad ux.

E.g. flatpak Steam can't access SteamLibraries at a non-default location, unless the user manually allows the path through flatseal. The same is true for other similar apps which don't use the file portal.

Issues like this are unexpected for new users and thus it can be argued that flatpak aren't a good recommendation for new users. I personally disagree because most flatpak work flawlessly and work everywhere independent of a users distro.