this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
147 points (93.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54008 readers
578 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I saw some threads here about Telegram and piracy stuff being banned. So, as an experimental alternative, I created a public Signal group for piracy.

Maybe it'll be useful?

Before joining

Signal supports usernames and hiding telephone numbers. Here's a blog entry on how to do so. You might want to:

  • set a username
  • change your profile name (these are two separate things!)
  • hide your phone number
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blicante@moist.catsweat.com 52 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Signal doesn't collect IPs and therefore can't even hand them out. It's been requested in 2021. Here's a list of requests from authorities they were allowed to publish. I've looked through 3 of the most recent and nowhere do they reveal IPs.

[–] liveinthisworld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sure they don't log the IPs, but it is technically impossible to not know the IP when you're running a centralized service.

[–] blicante@moist.catsweat.com 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What are the "popular" alternatives? Telegram stores everything, WhatsApp doesn't allow usernames, Matrix requires IPs too...

[–] JustMarkov@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Despite their claims of total privacy, I imagine, like any software company, they have full access to their own back end including encryption keys and server logs. Meaning they can and probably will moderate their own platform if there is enough pressure from nation states/IP owners.

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You are welcome to audit the source code and host the backend yourself.

[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You understand that, for everyone except for a complete network pro, that is worse for security and privacy, right?

Don't get me wrong, it's great that you can.

But the reason piracy websites struggle so much with long term stability isn't because they're hosting the wrong software.

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If you don't put trust on someone something, you left yourself to trust and do all the works. However, you don't trust yourself either, sadly I can't offer any solutions.

TBH I would just use email over TOR and encrypt communication with PGP. Rotate identities every now and then and you should be fine. Yes it doesn't have forward secrecy but it removes the effort to find the "right messaging" service and is instead ubiquitous (and you can sign up for anonymous email addresses online too, which makes it even better).