this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
511 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59574 readers
3467 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (4 children)

COOL, cool…. Hay why was the exact opposite ruled for apple?

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

The biggest reason is most likely that the cases had different judges.

[–] wax@feddit.nu 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Apple produces hardware for their walled garden, whereas Google imposes their terms on third parties. I can't speak to how this works legally, but thats the main difference as far as I understand.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It’s no longer an excuse for Apple. Since the EU’s ruling they now have to allow third party stores there: https://support.apple.com/en-us/118110 and of course they’ll fight tooth and nail against it here, the infrastructure exists so many of their previous arguments around not doing it are moot

[–] wax@feddit.nu 4 points 1 month ago

Cool, that's great news for Apple users

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

How the judges see it:

Google forces conditions onto other OEMs. They have to include a bunch of Google stuff on their phones if they want the play store and play services, which they realistically need, that's just a market reality. They have no real choice but to do whatever Google says. Google is abusing their market dominance to push their ecosystem, and the OEMs have no real choice but to play ball.

Apple doesn't force anybody else to use their products. They make their own ecosystem for their own phone. If iOS was available on non-Apple devices, and Apple was forcing stuff onto those OEMs knowing they have little other choice, Apple would be getting the same treatment.

[–] bastionntb@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Would like to know the answer, but feel like I already know.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Does that answer have anything to do with the great vehicular hobo massacre of 1988?

No?

You'd be surprised how often it's relevant, but kept virtually a secret.