this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
977 points (97.8% liked)

memes

10694 readers
2606 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tomatolung@sopuli.xyz 65 points 2 months ago (3 children)

What's funny to me is how they are in a fight for their company with the FTC, and they want to continue provoking people by increasing their revenue on the back of their users on a service they might have a technical monopoly on? Hmmmm...

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Provoking people and in dispute with FTC don’t relate but if the FTC broke them up then you would really regret not cashing in while you could

[–] ironsoap@lemmy.one 3 points 2 months ago

Insofar as the FTC is in a legal case with google, American users do not have individual standing. But the court of public opinion is another venue without the need for such logic. As this is a political decision to enforce and proceed eight the case as much as an economic one, I would beg to disagree that provocation is in their best interest.

Perhaps some would like to file a complaint? https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/submit-merger-antitrust-comment

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago

Line must go up...

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

YouTube isn't profitable. You want to talk antitrust in a meme about YouTube trying to make money on ads?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Suuure it's not.