this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
60 points (94.1% liked)

worldnews

1720 readers
3 users here now

Welcome! This community is constantly upgrading and is a current work in progress. Please stay tuned.

/c/Worldnews@sh.itjust.works strives for high-quality standards on the latest world events.

The basis of these standards comes from the MBFC, which uses an aggregate of methodologies, including the IFCN and World Freedom Indices, to rate the Bias and Factual Reporting of News.

These are non-profit organisations with full transparency of their funding and structure. Likewise, this community is also transparent – Please feel free to question its staff and the overall content of this community.


Does your post fit the standards? Check this thread!



Rules:


Disallowed submissions

Commenters will receive one public warning with only one strike if violating any of the following rules:

Thank you.

todo list:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

There are different types of radiation and not all of it is “safe”.

Calling this safe is ridiculous.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

It's well below internationally established limits, so it's safe at least by consensus. Their neighbor China releases far more than Japan does, and I think China is considered under the limit as well.

So Japan is doing the safe thing here, they're releasing at a safe rate, and only at much as they need to release.

This is just FUD to scare the average person from nuclear power, which is provably clean and safe.

[–] nbafantest@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

There's different wheels of radiation and this is very low.

Your comment is pure nuclear hysteria.