this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
53 points (90.8% liked)

History

1891 readers
1 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nick@midwest.social 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Yeah, turns out war is pretty fucked up. Look up the rape of nanjing. Or Pearl Harbor. Or Hiroshima.

You get the idea.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Imperial Japan was obviously a fascist state that needed to be dismantled (and sadly wasn't nearly as much as it should have been), but if we're talking barbarism, Pearl Harbor was nothing compared to the other items listed. It was an air strike on a naval base, nothing was really exceptional about it except that it's rare for someone to dare to attack the US.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was done during a period of negotiations for peace. It was the perfidy, not the damage, with a dose of racism/xenophobia that mobilized Americans.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

I'm pretty sure it was because someone dropped bombs on American soil. In any case, the fact that it touched on the American aggrievement fetish does not put it on par with the other events listed.

[–] SoJB@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Liberals and the irresistible urge to compare yourself to literal Nazis

[–] nick@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not really sure what you mean here. Is that what I’m doing in your estimation?

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Probably not intentionally. Looking at this and saying some variation of "war is hell" or "war is pretty fucked up" as you said is extremely handwavey. War being hell doesn't mean we can't focus on individual war crimes, particularly those done by the US.

Theres a lot of people who reflexively throw up there hands and say "War is Hell" (they're swarming here) when you bring up a US war crime. But if you bring up sonething done by a designated enemy of the US people don't do that.

Its may not be intentional but its still not good

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It does add needed context though. These arent peacetime actions of civilians. These are the actions of people forced into melting pot of slaughter.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

Its a war crime

[–] nick@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh yeah. I considered mentioning 9/11…. Of 1973. But suspect most people don’t know the us supported an attack on a foreign country surreptitiously. And abu ghraib, but wasn’t sure how it’s spelled.

This country is militarily fucked up, as are the cops.

There’s no whitewashing for me.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

Ah, the real 9/11 allende-rhetoric

I don't know how spell abu graib either lol

[–] Jumpingspiderman@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

And Japanese cannibalism of executed POW's, and Ishii's biological warefare unit. War is Hell.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, so taking skulls as war trophies is fine

[–] Wakmrow@hexbear.net 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Maybe I have an edgy take but I really don't care about brutality against Japanese imperialists. I hold them as much more evil than the Nazis during the 20th century.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

I don't care about the deaths of fascists. That doesn't make it less sick to take skulls as trophies.

The point is Amero-fascists are also barbarous and always have been. The "war is hell" handwaving getting invoked doesn't mean you can't talk about crimes. The sane way i wouldn't handwave away the many crimes of the Japanese fascists

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

That is edgy. Stalin virulently rebuked war crimes against Nazi Germany's civilians and POWs as it pushed them back.

By contrast, the brutality, starvation, and high death rates for nazi POWs held by the US in western europe during and after ww2 is not a story most ppl know about. Losurdo gets into this a bit, as well as contrasts the nazi's position that the slavic ppl must be eradicated and made into slaves, while the USSR's position was that germany and the german ppl will go on after the war, and efforts should be made to not follow the nazi's scorched earth policy.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

War is Hell.

I can just smell your armchair general smugness about saying that. You must feel very hardened and cool, calm, and collected watching explosions on screens. jagoff

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

hitler-detector all over the place in these comments

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

The US was the model for biological testing and eugenics, that's not why they fought japan, nor was it even one of the stated reasons at the time.