this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
53 points (90.8% liked)

History

1874 readers
5 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 8 points 5 days ago

Turns out if you dehumanise your enemies completely, war crimes happen.

Although the japanese mostly just mutilated you when you were alive.

[–] hackerwacker@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago

Nothing personnel kid

[–] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago

Ah sweet! Man made horrors beyond my comprehension!

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago

Lovely place

[–] nick@midwest.social 13 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Yeah, turns out war is pretty fucked up. Look up the rape of nanjing. Or Pearl Harbor. Or Hiroshima.

You get the idea.

[–] SoJB@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Liberals and the irresistible urge to compare yourself to literal Nazis

[–] nick@midwest.social 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not really sure what you mean here. Is that what I’m doing in your estimation?

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Probably not intentionally. Looking at this and saying some variation of "war is hell" or "war is pretty fucked up" as you said is extremely handwavey. War being hell doesn't mean we can't focus on individual war crimes, particularly those done by the US.

Theres a lot of people who reflexively throw up there hands and say "War is Hell" (they're swarming here) when you bring up a US war crime. But if you bring up sonething done by a designated enemy of the US people don't do that.

Its may not be intentional but its still not good

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It does add needed context though. These arent peacetime actions of civilians. These are the actions of people forced into melting pot of slaughter.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 1 points 6 days ago

Its a war crime

[–] nick@midwest.social 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Oh yeah. I considered mentioning 9/11…. Of 1973. But suspect most people don’t know the us supported an attack on a foreign country surreptitiously. And abu ghraib, but wasn’t sure how it’s spelled.

This country is militarily fucked up, as are the cops.

There’s no whitewashing for me.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 5 points 6 days ago

Ah, the real 9/11 allende-rhetoric

I don't know how spell abu graib either lol

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Imperial Japan was obviously a fascist state that needed to be dismantled (and sadly wasn't nearly as much as it should have been), but if we're talking barbarism, Pearl Harbor was nothing compared to the other items listed. It was an air strike on a naval base, nothing was really exceptional about it except that it's rare for someone to dare to attack the US.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

Just normal Freedom and Democracy things, no need to worry about it

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What does this say about the guys that thought this was a good idea?

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 4 points 6 days ago

That they're war criminals

[–] Name@feddit.nu 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's an overly generous view of war crimes

[–] Name@feddit.nu 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Feel free to pitch in with more takes

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Seems necessary with all the "war is hell" handwaving going on to point out that the people who did this are war criminals

[–] Name@feddit.nu 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not sure how that is relevant since I have made no statement regarding the legality of such things but 👍

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You made an excuse for war crimes

[–] Name@feddit.nu 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, no. I did no such thing.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

In this thread there's been a lot of handwaving about "war is hell." You said war is desensitizing and that the peoole who did war crimes were "unstable."

Thats really common when US war crimes are brought up. "Well obviously war is hell/war is desensitizing/they were just crazy," gets deployed, instead of the most obvious thing staring us in the face - the core US value of white supremecy.

War is hell. What about the culture of white supremacy, genocide, rascism, and aparthied the men who commited these crimes came from? Was it really just war that desensitized them?

You may not, even probably aren't falling into this consciously. But you are making excuses for war crimes and the reality of what the US actually is.

[–] Name@feddit.nu 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Still no. You don't have a point here, however much you try to force one.

If others are 'handwaving' war crimes, that's on them and you can argue with them about it. :-)

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Name@feddit.nu 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What I wrote lol. I'd say that someone who thinks sending skulls back home to their families is not in a sound state of mind.

[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sure no subtext there. Fucking smug ass lib

[–] Name@feddit.nu 1 points 4 days ago
[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sure but I dk if I would want to be with a guy that sent me the head of his enemies as a momento. Like 40's girl wants a skulls ? They dating Wednesday Adams?

[–] Name@feddit.nu 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'd probably not want to be in the same squad lol. Soldiers taking trophies from their enemies bodies gives of an unstable vibe

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 4 points 6 days ago

Whaaa!? Skulls for the Skull throne is 100% mentally stable.