this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
222 points (97.8% liked)

PC Gaming

8502 readers
372 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] warm@kbin.earth 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They just dont want to invest the time to overhaul the engine or start from scratch. Even Call of Duty managed to do this.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

“Even one of the largest and most well funded game franchises in history did this”

[–] warm@kbin.earth 12 points 3 weeks ago

Call of Duty is known for recycling as much as possible to pump out yearly games, I was actually surprised to hear they convinced management to give them time to rebuild the engine.

Besides, doesn't Bethesda Game Studios have more employees than Infinity Ward?

[–] vasametropolis@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Elder Scrolls probably fits this category as well - not as much as Call of Duty but Bethesda probably has amongst the best RPG sales of anyone. They sold a hilarious number of copies of Skyrim alone.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, because Microsoft/ZeniMax/Bethesda is such a small corporation and Fallout/The Elder Scrolls is such an inconsequential, low budget franchise.