I come online to somewhat get away from the 'real world', the last thing I want to do is engage in small talk with the local population. You know what kind of people would end up the most vocal on there too, so fuck no.
warm
joined 6 months ago
It's an attempt at piggybacking off the success of the first game, but they don't take the time to understand why it was successful and if a sequel is needed. I'd love to see devs try something new when they find success instead of just pumping out a number 2.
Wouldn't be too bad if they just host threads and abide by ActivityPub without getting hands on, but they clearly want to shape it how they want.
Darkest Dungeon was just one of them titles that isn't that suited for a sequel.
Maybe I used a mod or something, I dont know, wasnt very memorable aha (well all I remember is excessive amounts of fog), quickly gave up on it.
You could have made a private lobby. Although RDR Online isnt too exciting anyway.
A good game will sell itself though. How they spent 8 years on it, I don't know.
I'm just not interested in any franchise because of this. LOTR is suffering from it a lot at the moment as every man and his dog is trying to cash in on the IP. That's with tv shows and games too, it extends beyond just films for these franchises.
A lot of shit games still sell millions on the back of marketing, so for a game to sell as little as concord, it had to be a whole new level of shit along with shitty marketing.
Remember when people posted on YouTube for fun? It's only when it became a viable business that the platform turned to shit.
According to Steam it does. I stay away from AAA bullshit myself anyway.
view more: next ›
Yes, can vote to either end the game immediately and ban them or turn them into a frog for the rest of the match and then they are banned.