this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
500 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

60036 readers
2949 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
500
Almost nine gigabytes in size: Windows update 24H2 creates an undeletable cache file (www.digitec.ch)
submitted 2 months ago by fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
146 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

People used 3.1 and 3.1.1 for years even though it was running on top of MSDOS but show me someone who used 3.0? Or 1.x, 2.x? Unheard of. Version 3 started off with some problems that needed a more or less immediate large update.

[โ€“] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yes people used 3.1. I used 3.1. Windows 2.1 was very popular because of Excel and Word. The Windows/386 version of 2.1 gave 32bit preemptive multitasking to DOS. It was a big enough hit that MS gave up on OS/2 which was 286 only.

But Win95 was on a whole new level. That's why I said Win3.1 was trash compared to Win 95.