this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
35 points (97.3% liked)
Futurology
1784 readers
69 users here now
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The headline says
The FT article references this as its source of data - https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/neet-statistics-annual-brief#dataBlock-58d70635-dc1a-4172-997b-fb5bc73d7166-tables .
But that source says
So where is FT getting its figures from? Or did they just pretend that training is the same thing as inactivity? (•_•)
I have found ft.com to be very unreliable in the past.