this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
-61 points (23.0% liked)

Political Memes

5349 readers
2054 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echo@lemmings.world 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)
The evidence is that if they don’t vote for her then they’re going to get Trump

Yes. That’s right. And it’s entirely Harris’s fault. No one else’s. She could change policy and earn their vote. She doesn’t, and so hands the election to Trump.

Oh fuck off with that... They'd rather vote for the fascist who has outright said he'd destroy Hamas? That's on them for being stupid fucking morons. Don't blame Harris for their stupidity.

At the general election for POTUS is the wrong fucking time to plant your stake in the ground. Anyone who wants a different candidate in 2028 that supports their views needed to get really involved in 2020, at the latest. The next best time to do that is right now for 2028. I'm not defending Harris. I'm saying the people you're talking about are fucking morons and need to suddenly get smart.

[–] Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

And let's be clear here what you're advocating.

In the case that the Republicans are worse than the Democrats, people should vote Democrat and no other party.

The Republicans will always be worse than the Democrats.

Therefore, people should always vote Democrat in all cases and no other party.

That's exactly the Chinese totalitarian system. One party which you must vote for regardless of what you think of their policies.

[–] echo@lemmings.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm saying that Harris or Trump will be the next POTUS and all you can do right now is express your preference on which one you want it to be.

If you're driving down the road and you come to a situation where you can either run over a person or hit a telephone pole then you have to decide what to do. You can gripe and moan about your situation and how you don't want to either one, but that doesn't change the reality. If you choose to not make a choice then the choice will be made for you and you'll have to live with the consequences.

[–] Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

you'll have to live with the consequences.

That's true of all decisions. You're advocating a single party autocracy. One whose opening policy is to support genocide. You'll have to live with the consequences of that decision too.

[–] echo@lemmings.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm telling you the reality that Harris or Trump will be the next POTUS. Which one do you want it to be?

[–] Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I'm not required to want either.

"Either some Ukrainian soldiers die, or Putin takes over Ukraine, that's the reality"...

"Oh! So you want Ukrainian soldiers to die!"

Being prepared to risk something is not the same as actively promoting that thing. This is not up for debate, it's a basic fact.

[–] Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Anyone who wants a different candidate in 2028 that supports their views needed to get really involved in 2020, at the latest.

They did.

Again, your blind faith that the system will work if only the people just tried harder is sycophantic at best, if not downright insulting.

And besides, you're the one imploring them to just vote without any regard to policy, so what exactly is "getting involved"?

Why would the Democrats listen to anything anyone says if they're guaranteed your vote come election day anyway?

[–] echo@lemmings.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

And besides, you’re the one imploring them to just vote without any regard to policy, so what exactly is “getting involved”?

No, I'm saying that at this point in time that the next POTUS is either going to be Harris or Trump. Which of those two do you want it to be? Vote accordingly.

[–] Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

That's the same thing.

Your claim is that, come election time, we should always vote for the least worst party which has a chance of getting in. That's always the Democrats and always will be if we follow your system.

So the corollary of your system is that one party runs America for ever.

So why bother with elections at all?

[–] echo@lemmings.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You can deny reality all you want, but Harris or Trump is going to be the next POTUS. Which one do you want it to be?

[–] Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I want it to be whichever results from us attempting to preserve democracy.

Our nation has taken far, far bigger risks than 4 years of Trump to preserve democracy.

Determining something to be an acceptable risk is not the same as wanting it. Casualties are an acceptable risk of a just war. No one says people want soldiers to die.

I'm prepared to risk a Trump presidency to preserve some semblance of democracy and make it clear that genocide is never an acceptable option. That doesn't mean I want a Trump presidency any more than being prepared to risk soldier's lives during war means you want soldiers to die.

[–] echo@lemmings.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I’m prepared to risk a Trump presidency

You're not taking a risk. You are promoting a Trump presidency. If you can't or won't accept reality then there is no need to continue this conversation.