this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
-62 points (22.8% liked)

Political Memes

5349 readers
2127 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echo@lemmings.world 3 points 1 day ago (15 children)

The evidence is that this group would vote for her if she changed policy on arms sales to Israel.

The evidence is that if they don't vote for her then they're going to get Trump who will absolutely destroy Gaza (and the U.S.) If they don't vote for her or don't vote at all then they are fucking morons. They will take their moral convictions to their graves.

[–] Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social 0 points 1 day ago (14 children)

The evidence is that if they don't vote for her then they're going to get Trump

Yes. That's right. And it's entirely Harris's fault. No one else's. She could change policy and earn their vote. She doesn't, and so hands the election to Trump.

Yet you're such a sycophant that instead of outrage at her, you're outraged at the voters whom you think somehow owe her a vote. You're outraged at the people practising democracy for not falling into line with the authoritarians trying to undermine it.

Harris will win more votes than she will lose if she changes policy on arms sales to Israel. That is what the evidence shows - overwhelming support for such a policy among previously Democrat voters and abstainers in key states.

Candidates changing policy to meet voter's expectations is exactly how democracy functions, even flawed ones like the US normally vaguely track voter preferences.

So if Harris changed policy she would not worsen her support, nor would she be doing anything other than her job.

The fact that she isn't will be the single fact responsible for a Trump win, if he wins. Nothing else. Every other person involved would have been acting accordingly, only the Harris team are out of line.

They are acting undemocratically, and probably illegally, backing a genocide. And you're defending them, and attacking the people supporting democracy and peace...

[–] echo@lemmings.world 2 points 11 hours ago (13 children)
The evidence is that if they don’t vote for her then they’re going to get Trump

Yes. That’s right. And it’s entirely Harris’s fault. No one else’s. She could change policy and earn their vote. She doesn’t, and so hands the election to Trump.

Oh fuck off with that... They'd rather vote for the fascist who has outright said he'd destroy Hamas? That's on them for being stupid fucking morons. Don't blame Harris for their stupidity.

At the general election for POTUS is the wrong fucking time to plant your stake in the ground. Anyone who wants a different candidate in 2028 that supports their views needed to get really involved in 2020, at the latest. The next best time to do that is right now for 2028. I'm not defending Harris. I'm saying the people you're talking about are fucking morons and need to suddenly get smart.

[–] Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And let's be clear here what you're advocating.

In the case that the Republicans are worse than the Democrats, people should vote Democrat and no other party.

The Republicans will always be worse than the Democrats.

Therefore, people should always vote Democrat in all cases and no other party.

That's exactly the Chinese totalitarian system. One party which you must vote for regardless of what you think of their policies.

[–] echo@lemmings.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I'm saying that Harris or Trump will be the next POTUS and all you can do right now is express your preference on which one you want it to be.

If you're driving down the road and you come to a situation where you can either run over a person or hit a telephone pole then you have to decide what to do. You can gripe and moan about your situation and how you don't want to either one, but that doesn't change the reality. If you choose to not make a choice then the choice will be made for you and you'll have to live with the consequences.

[–] Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

you'll have to live with the consequences.

That's true of all decisions. You're advocating a single party autocracy. One whose opening policy is to support genocide. You'll have to live with the consequences of that decision too.

[–] echo@lemmings.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I'm telling you the reality that Harris or Trump will be the next POTUS. Which one do you want it to be?

[–] Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I'm not required to want either.

"Either some Ukrainian soldiers die, or Putin takes over Ukraine, that's the reality"...

"Oh! So you want Ukrainian soldiers to die!"

Being prepared to risk something is not the same as actively promoting that thing. This is not up for debate, it's a basic fact.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)