this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
100 points (89.7% liked)

World News

38970 readers
2287 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A drugs haul weighing more than an elephant has been seized in the Mexican navy's biggest ever drugs bust.

The operation saw 23 people arrested off the country's southwest coast.

The haul weighed some 8,400kg - an elephant can weigh up to 6,000kg on average, according to the WWF.

"This represents the largest quantity of drugs seized in a maritime operation, without precedent in the history of the institution," the navy said in a statement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 46 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Properly speaking, there is no such thing as nanoelephants. That's just an informal unit used by coke dealers for marketing purposes. Elephants are obviously an imperial unit, and "nano-" is an SI/metric prefix. You have to break it down or use fractions. There's 103 golden retrievers per elephant, 14 footballs to the the golden retriever, 9 eight-track cassettes per football, and 525 liberal tears per cassette. You should have been using liberal tears to be scientific.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 11 points 2 weeks ago

You forgot the standard football field unit, we use it to measure the space station.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Are we talking metric golden retrievers or imperial golden retrievers?

[–] VubDapple@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

How many liberal tears in a banana? For scale purposes of course.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Imperial units are all defined in terms of SI units now. A liberal tear is conveniently defined as 989µℓ. Making one elephant roughly 6738.5ℓ.

According to WolframAlpha, the volume of a banana is 124mℓ. So I believe there are 125.4 tears per banana.