Crazy Ideas

244 readers

101 users here now

Just crazy ideas!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

How about we make a law saying that employers have to pay job applicants a minimum of an hour's wage just for the time it takes to apply and get an interview? (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by over_clox@lemmy.world to c/crazyideas@lemmy.world

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Like seriously, time is money right? I'm sure most people can relate to wasting time on numerous applications before ever landing a job. If they set that into law, employers will probably be much less likely to reject applicants, and even when they do, you still get paid for your wasted time.

Edit: I'm not particularly referring to the application part alone, I'm referring to application + interview = rejection. People should get paid for someone calling you in, only to end up wasting your time. Hell, I could have spent that time better at the sperm bank.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You're volunteering to apply though...

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Right, because "if you don't get a job, you get to live in a cardboard box under a bridge" isn't duress at all.

I'm not saying I'm for OP's plan. I'm still thinking it through. But there's nothing "voluntary" about working for a paycheck, or about applying to do so.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

Right... we aren't free. Much like the past, and perhaps even in the future. You cannot get hung up on something that is out of your control. We may live and die 10,000 more times before humanity can know true peace.

The best we got right now is "maybe you to could exploit the working class if you grind hard enough".

Sad as fuck considering our level of technological development. Gatekeeping necessities from people to drive them to do what you want. The extra steps to feudalism is not doing it for me.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's what unemployment is for. :) It's not on the business to pay applicants.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The last time I had unemployment, it was a lousy $64 per week, and only for 3 months no less. Unemployment is a joke.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Depends on your income before you were unemployed... My wife is drawing it right now and it's something like $450 a week for her.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I was working for 6 days a week, 6 hours a day, for $10 per hour, for over 2 years. Yes, $10 an hour sounds like chump change these days, but this was back in like 2007.

Still..

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, true that. I was more specifically refering to the interview part, being a pure waste of time if you're rejected. And if it was an in-person interview, you've not only wasted time, but very likely have burned gas going there and back.

You know the saying "When you don't have a job, your only job is to get a job"? Yeah, I think that saying is about a load of horse shit. If looking for a job is considered a job itself, then I feel people should get paid for their wasted time.

Or, ya know, don't have a system where someone files 73 job applications only to get basically nowhere.