this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
328 points (98.2% liked)

Facepalm

2593 readers
609 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mvirts@lemmy.world -2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm thinking the poster could easily use chatGPT the same way as his opponent, there is no advantage to one side or the other here.

The main value in introducing a third party (which in this case is software) is to take ego out of an argument and start arguing against a problem rather than a person. This is why I referred to it as therapy. chatGPT is an echo chamber of human writing with a few guardrails, much like speaking with an impartial therapist.

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

If your partner is an "opponent" in an argument, then you've lost the plot of your relationship. It's you and your partner against the issue, not against each other.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 1 points 9 hours ago

Not if he's vegan. Vegans can't use ChatGPT.