this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
111 points (92.4% liked)

Technology

59440 readers
3281 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Not disappointed by The Verge, first paragraph paraphrases the title with no source and the following is just off topic.

[–] Dot@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] baru@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah, indeed:

Today, more than a quarter of all new code at Google is generated by AI, then reviewed and accepted by engineers. This helps our engineers do more and move faster.

Sounds like bs to me, comes across as marketing talk to promote their AI offerings.

[–] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree that it's suspicious. This is a HUGE number that would imply a drastic change in their development process and I'm surprised that they don't give much more information, especially since (as you said) it would promote their product.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

They don't give information because there is no information to give. It is just empty rhetoric to bullshit financial analysts. The CEO probably just sent out a company wide email a week before telling developers to do this and they all laughed.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)