btaf45

Yes I would like to know what that means for ChromeOS and Chromebooks. If the new "Chrome" company got ChromeOS also that would be huge. But if that is not a requirement Google could just put another Chromium browser in ChromeOS. They could also continue to sell Chromebooks but based on a ChromiumOS fork.

What does Chrome have to do with a node.js server?

all communities with the same name from different instances to show up in a mixed feed.

That's what usenet does.

What's your point? Ban "evasion" is a feature of fediverse, not a bug. In the fediverse, you are immune from rando-bans.

Anybody who really does deserve to be banned, will repeat the behaviour that got them banned. So for those people there is no point with ban "evasion".

Well if that's the definition that doesn't sound so bad. You're saying that you don't like being reminded of the truth too often.

The problem with 'woke' is that it is too vague to be meaningful.

What an ignorant vague assertion with no evidence.

What’s to stop them just making another browser?

Nothing. Chromium is open source. So they could just fork it and declare a new "official" google browser and it would be a lot like Chrome.

I'm not sure why the govt thinks forcing google to give up a particular fork/branch of an open source browser is all that meaningful. It might make more sense if Chrome was a closed source one of a kind browser.

Be 35 or older, be a natural citizen of the United States, and have lived in the United States for the last 14 years.

There is a 4th requirement which is that you cannot have engaged in insurrection against the country. Although that requirement is not being followed.

Dems did not move to the right at all in this election. If anything Harris policies went beyond Biden.

You can't trust ebay ratings either because if you have a bad experience they often won't let you post a review

there is nothing you can do about it

You can just post from a different lemmy instance.