this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
86 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

59676 readers
3248 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lando55@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It does if you consider it from the point of view of a. Someone went out of their way to design this API so as to allow this or b. A team of individuals deployed it without realizing how it would be exploited

You can generally learn things from a breach, but finding and remediating systemic issues like those mentioned above is a big ask

Edit: I either responded to the wrong comment or misunderstood what you said. It's late in the day...

[–] unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you replied to the right post (mine) but I didn't downvote you.

Information disclosure doesn't necessarily imply it's intentional or unintentional, just that information was disclosed. But in a sense I do agree somewhat with that you said, only that WHO the person who developed the API receives that message from makes a huge difference. The IT security team coming to you and says "information disclosure" is scarier than a team mate

[–] lando55@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh I wish that were true but unless GRC or Legal get involved nothing much comes of it lol