this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
230 points (97.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5189 readers
433 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
230
The Trump Administration Rolled Back More Than 100 Environmental Rules. Here’s the Full List. [2021 article] (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 2 days ago by TheTechnician27@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Its ok to just not respond if you don't know the answer

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This is so transparently projecting from the fact that you can't answer by naming a single policy or regulation, which is pretty sad. Go ahead. The NYT listed 100 of them; it should be easy to find at least one. And you're in a Solarpunk community to boot, so I'm sure you care enough about the environment that you keep up with this news, right? You're not just concern trolling about an issue you don't actually keep up with to get in a shallow "own" against the Biden administration and then scrambling to save face when it's pointed out you don't know shit about fuck, right?

[–] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People asking simple questions makes you really mad

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Are you admitting you can't name even one?

[–] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why do you hate me so much

[–] Imnebuddy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"I have never really understood exactly what a 'liberal' is, since I have heard 'liberals' express every conceivable opinion on every conceivable subject. As far as I can tell, you have the extreme right, who are fascist racist capitalist dogs like Ronald Reagan, who come right out and let you know where they're coming from. And on the opposite end, you have the left, who are supposed to be committed to justice, equality, and human rights. And somewhere between those two points is the liberal.

As far as I'm concerned, 'liberal' is the most meaningless word in the dictionary. History has shown me that as long as some white middle-class people can live high on the hog, take vacations to Europe, send their children to private schools, and reap the benefits of their white skin privilege, then they are 'liberal'. But when times get hard and money gets tight, they pull off that liberal mask and you think you're talking to Adolf Hitler. They feel sorry for the so-called underprivileged just as long as they can maintain their own privileges."

---Assata: An Autobiography

[–] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 days ago

What did I say to warrant such a vicious reply