this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
30 points (78.8% liked)

Selfhosted

39980 readers
424 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I know how RAID work and prevent data lost from disks failures. I want to know is possible way/how easy to recover data from unfunctioned remaining RAID disks due to RAID controller failure or whole system failure. Can I even simply attach one of the RAID 1 disk to the desktop system and read as simple as USB disk? I know getting data from the other RAID types won't be that simple but is there a way without building the whole RAID system again. Thanks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You really do not want hardware raid. You want software raid like LVM or better yet, ZFS.

Do your own research. Keep in mind raid isn't a backup. It is only for convenience.

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

A lot of "hardware raid" is just a separate controller doing software raid. I thought I lost access to a bunch of data when my raid controller died, before I realized that I could just plug the disks directly into the computer and mount them with mdadm. But yes, hardware raid seems a bit pointless nowadays.

[–] NotSpez@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If op is considering ZFS: Do. Not. Use. RAIDz. (learned the hard way)

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why wouldn't you? It is the most flexible out if all of them.

[–] NotSpez@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

In my experience, using spinning disks, the performance is very poor, and times for scrub and resilver are very long. For example, in a raidz1 with 4x8TB, scrubbing takes 2-3 weeks and resilvering takes almost 2 months. I must also add very poor performance in degraded state. This is a very old post, but things are still the same.

[–] Zeoic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You must have shingled/SMR drives. They do not work well with any type of raid array.

My array of 7x12TB drives resilvers in a few hours, as I made sure I got CMR drives

[–] NotSpez@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That makes total sense. Thanks!

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago

I've not had that experience