this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
398 points (98.3% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2193 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The UK has introduced the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, aiming to make it illegal for future generations to buy cigarettes. The bill proposes gradually raising the minimum smoking age, so those born after January 1, 2009, will never be able to purchase tobacco legally.

It also includes restrictions on vape flavors and packaging to prevent youth addiction and bans smoking in certain outdoor spaces, though pub beer gardens are exempt.

Supported by the Labour Party's majority, the legislation seeks to create a “smoke-free U.K.” and combat smoking-related deaths.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 57 points 1 week ago (47 children)

Pushing an entire business into black market over time... Who in their right mind approved this?

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Exactly. Smoking was dying off due to vaping until all these countries got a stick up their ass over it and decided to either outright ban vapes or put ridiculous regulations on them. This is why everyone uses disposables in the US now and toss their lithium batteries in the trash every couple days.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

vaping was much worse because people blatantly use them indoors and wherever else they shouldn't. And due to them not needing to light up they just constantly puff on them between every three breaths. It's fucking awful being in a queue or walking behind someone vaping.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Supported by the Labour Party's majority, the legislation seeks to create a “smoke-free U.K.” and combat smoking-related deaths.

vaping was much worse

Why?

because people blatantly use them indoors and wherever else they shouldn't

I don't know if that really makes them worse than premature death.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People who vape are using nicotine much, much more often because it's just so much easier now. And it taste like bubblegum. The whole idea of vape as a means to quit smoking was a myth created by vaping companies. Nicotine is also bad for you, not just the smoke. And then there's the issues of the other compounds inside vaping liquids that should be heading into your lungs. It's insane we let this get this far.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

People who vape are using nicotine much, much more often because it's just so much easier now.

Do you have some proof to support this? And even if it's true, why is that your concern to the point where you feel justified in jailing individuals for using it?

The whole idea of vape as a means to quit smoking was a myth created by vaping companies.

This is false on multiple levels. First, because people who vape instead of smoke are no longer smoking, and second because countless people have used them to quit using nicotine as you can buy different strengths of juice and taper yourself down to 0mg/ml juice which is something that I've personally witnessed numerous people do.

Nicotine is also bad for you, not just the smoke.

The smoke is what gives you cancer. Nicotine does increase your blood pressure and heart rate, but so do cheeseburgers and soda, and I don't see you or anyone else trying to assign criminal penalties to individuals for using those.

And then there's the issues of the other compounds inside vaping liquids that should be heading into your lungs.

Like propylene glycol which is used in asthma inhalers? Vegetable glycerine which is used in sports drinks to candy to heart medications? What harmful chemicals are you referring to?

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's worse because smoking had started to be relegated to designated areas. Non smokers could much more easily avoid smokers. But vaping is so easy to do that you can no longer avoid them. You go to a gathering of any kind and you're guaranteed to have at least one arsehole not respecting other peoples decisions to not smoke/vape

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You're equating the harms from second-hand smoke with vaping here, which don't exist as they're caused by the chemical reactions that occur when you burn plant matter.

I'm not arguing that it's okay for people to vape where they're not supposed to, but you're blowing things out of proportion here. The real danger to your lungs while in a gathering is from catching COVID from one of the individuals nearby you.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I'm equating the fact that I could more consistently distance myself from smokers. I can't do that with vapers. When getting into a gig it was relatively rare to end up next to a snooker that just didn't care anyway. Nowadays though you can't get away from vapers who vape way more often than they would've done with smoking.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Look up popcorn lung. Vaping is not better than smoking.

[–] NeuronautML@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You mentioned popcorn lung 3 times already and i did look it up and i think you don't understand what popcorn lung is, so i will write it for whoever is reading because i didn't know either.

Popcorn lung is a colloquialism for an illness named bronchiolitis obliterans, caused by diacetyl, a product found on early black market vapes that has been banned or discontinued for nearly 10 years now. Most clear market vapes already had discontinued the use of dyacetyl because they knew of the health risks, but only black market vapes were using it as a means to save money.

Moreover, dyacetyl was not being used in nicotine vapes, it was being used in Cannabis vapes, as such, no exclusively nicotine products vaper who used store bought liquids was ever exposed to popcorn lung. So maybe you should read up on what popcorn lung is, before posting several comments about it. I don't vape but i have family members who quit smoking because of vapes and i don't appreciate your blatant misinformation about them. If there are legitimate criticisms of vaping, by all means post them, but this is a falsehood you are propagating.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Oh boo hoo!

People being mildly annoying means they should be banned? Cigarettes were killing smokers and those around them. That's the line for me. If your actions harm others, then it gets restricted.

Vapes are nowhere near that line. They just smell weird.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

We don't have 30 year studies on vapes like we do with cigarettes.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I don't want any sort of chemical in my lungs, I should be able to choose what to inhale not the selfish arsehole stood in front of me. I or others should not be affected by other people's bad decisions.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They really are. Popcorn lung is a thing with vapers. Plus I don’t want to inhale their nasty nicotine on accident. They need to have some damn respect for people around them instead of blatant selfishness. That’s the line for me.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Secondhand nicotine does you no harm. The reason cigarettes are so bad for you is that you're smoking tar. That's what makes the walls of a smokers home yellow, and what gives them cancer.

Nicotine is addictive, but largely harmless at the levels in cigarettes and vapes for the primary smoker. A secondhand smoker will be getting almost nothing. The problem with vapes is, I suspect, the flavourings. I'm aware of mounting evidence that they're not harmless, but I think that's only to primary vapers, not secondary.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

largely harmless at the levels in cigarettes and vapes for the primary smoker

The cardiovascular effects of nicotine over the long term are likely not harmless at all. There's no reason to believe that combustion is the reason PAD, stroke, and other cardiovascular disease is associated with smoking. There is a very good reason to believe that a potent vasoconstrictor is, however.

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Vaping is currently almost completely unregulated and some studies have found terrifying chemicals in them

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So regulate them and enforce it.

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not ban. Regulate, like food. Have standards and enforce them.

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev -1 points 1 week ago

Except they aren't like food. Vaping isn't required to live. It's purely recreational and aimed at children.

But I'm happy with either regulation or a ban.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 1 week ago

Are we still going on about the diacetyl and studies that drove the coils so hard they were basically incinerating the cotton and juice?

load more comments (44 replies)