this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
808 points (98.1% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2241 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Russian official Dmitry Medvedev, a close ally of Vladimir Putin, suggested Donald Trump’s election victory may benefit Russia’s interests in Ukraine, citing Trump’s reluctance to fund “idiotic allies” and “voracious international organizations.”

Although Medvedev stopped short of celebrating, he hinted Trump’s aversion to foreign spending could weaken U.S. support for Ukraine.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky cautiously congratulated Trump, recalling their recent discussion on U.S.-Ukraine cooperation.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov maintained a guarded tone, noting the U.S. remains an “unfriendly country” involved in the Ukraine conflict.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lol y'all will never learn. This is the whole Bernie Bros cost Clinton the election. Why don't you take a look at the real reasons she never was going to win.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because American men won’t elect a woman

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If that's what you believe, why didn't you demand that a man take her place?

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because I don’t have a problem voting for a woman.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It seems like you might have a problem with it since you're insisting that she lost because she's a woman.

Your graph seems to indicate that education level has more to do with voting preferences than gender.

Edit: and this seems to contradict your theory that this is all about gender biases and not something else like abandoning the party base

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 3 points 1 week ago

I don’t know how much insisting I’m doing. There are lots of reasons. I feel like that’s putting words in my mouth.