this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
83 points (94.6% liked)

science

14806 readers
258 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

When a dog shakes water off its fur, the action is not just a random flurry of movements — nor a deliberate effort to drench anyone standing nearby.

This instinctive reflex is shared by many furry mammals including mice, cats, squirrels, lions, tigers and bears. The move helps animals to remove water, insects or other irritants from hard-to-reach places. But underlying the shakes is a complex — and previously mysterious — neurological mechanism.

Now, researchers have identified the neural circuit that triggers characteristic ‘wet dog’ shaking behaviour in mice — which involves a specific class of touch receptors, and neurons that connect the spinal cord to the brain. Their findings were published in Science on 7 November.

“The touch system is so complex and rich that [it] can distinguish a water droplet from a crawling insect from the gentle touch of a loved one,” says Kara Marshall, a neuroscientist at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas. “It’s really remarkable to be able to link a very specific subset of touch receptors to this familiar and understandable behaviour.”

Research article was featured on the cover of this issue of Science, with a glorious picture of a brown bear doing the "wet dog shake" (https://www.science.org/toc/science/current)

Research article: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adq8834

Please let me know if there is paywall

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I had no idea it was such a mystery why wet dogs shake themselves dry.

[–] zlatiah@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well neuroscience isn't a very old field... More seriously though, I think biomedical scientists know surprisingly little about something if NIH doesn't fund it... aaand that's how we understood so little about our own household companions (and a bit too much about cancer. Seriously why do we know so many weird things about cancer much of those don't even translate into therapeutics)

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Because we're trying to combat cancer instead of dogs

[–] poplargrove@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I'm glad were not trying to combat dogs