Personal Finance

3819 readers

2 users here now

Learn about budgeting, saving, getting out of debt, credit, investing, and retirement planning. Join our community, read the PF Wiki, and get on top of your finances!

Note: This community is not region centric, so if you are posting anything specific to a certain region, kindly specify that in the title (something like [USA], [EU], [AUS] etc.)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

WandererLagomorph799@lemmy.ml

nieceandtows@programming.dev

nieceandtows@lemmy.ml

741

Landlords should have to pay income tax on their rental properties regardless of whether they're rented out or not. (gothamist.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de to c/personalfinance@lemmy.ml

430 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/12162

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there's still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SunriseParabellum@hexbear.net 57 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can vote for who runs the state, I can't vote for my landlord.

[–] bagend@hexbear.net 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

these pro-landlord tankies don't believe in democracy smdh

[–] ATQ@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can rent from someone else. That’s actually easier than moving cities, states, or countries.

[–] SunriseParabellum@hexbear.net 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can I rent from someone who isn't a capitalist who's charging me way more than the cost of upkeep for the property to make a profit? Also even if we have a housing market wouldn't the option to live in public housing be good for less well off people to help drive down rents on the private housing market?

[–] ATQ@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If you want to argue that the government should develop low cost housing, that’s an interesting discussion. In general, “supply” regardless of how it’s created, is the answer to high housing prices. I do fear that you’ll be dissatisfied with the quality of that government housing.

[–] The_Jewish_Cuban@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago

No it's not. That's why you have houses and apartments for hypothetical millionaires going empty because no one can actually afford them. As long as homes and real estate have speculative value there is no guarantee that "supply" will positively affect prices or affect them enough to provide housing for everyone.

The simple fact that there are more empty homes and apartments than there are homeless people disproves your premise.

[–] SunriseParabellum@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago

I do fear that you’ll be dissatisfied with the quality of that government housing.

IDK Austria and a few other Euro nations seem to be pulling it off okay.