this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
95 points (99.0% liked)

Movies & TV

22881 readers
140 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
WhyEssEff@hexbear.net
Zoift@hexbear.net
Jadzia_Dax@hexbear.net
thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net
Walk_On@hexbear.net
Infamousblt@hexbear.net
Grebgreb@hexbear.net
ultraviolet@hexbear.net
InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net
Sulvor@hexbear.net
95
The Wrath of Khan at home. (hexbear.net)
submitted 1 week ago by Yuritopiaposadism@hexbear.net to c/movies@hexbear.net
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LGOrcStreetSamurai@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I genuinely think the aesthetics 2005-2015 were some of the "safest" ever. It's really crazy in such a booming era of the new "endless blockbuster season" that things looked so very plain on screen. Visually things were just so "safe" visually on screen.