this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
56 points (72.6% liked)
Linuxsucks
175 readers
97 users here now
Shit on Desktop Linux and its evangelists here
No evangelizing for Linux
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It doesn't matter to me that much whether you use Windows, Mac or Linux. It's just that there are a lot of articles saying how Windows keeps nagging people to upgrade to 11, how they keep breaking their own product, how they haven't fixed 20 year old bugs, how they tack on stuff like AI that nobody asked for, on and on. As the local tech wiz my family and friends complain to me about these unwanted changes too from time to time. On the Mac side it's more polished but you're locked into a very limited set of hardware options. The thing is that it's not a given that an OS or computers do these things. There is a good alternative, and Linux evangelists (which you could call me one of) are simply making people aware of it.
"I use Linux" is an assertion that you haven't ceded most of the control of your computer to Microsoft or Apple, and that you are willing to trade a little bit of convenience for software freedom. Just like Lemmy is to Reddit, Bluesky and Mastodon are to Xitter.
Which will protect them from root kits, boot kits, and keyloggers. It's ran by a corporation that has a reputation to uphold and we've seen in the past where people complain about Windows yet weren't being responsible with updates. -Nagging justified.
Inherent with features. In contrast, Linux users harassed FOSS developers into quitting projects (Ueberzug for example) which broke several daily softwares for me. Updating to Pipewire because 'it's ready' broke ac3 passthrough. Wayland because 'its ready' broke drag and drop between windows and doesn't work with a DWM that took time and effort to configure. Then, there's the breaking problems faced by running rolling release or cutting edge (which still runs behind Windows on tech) - This topic could be it's own thread.
Linux has had decade old bugs in recent news.
Features that are in expensive Photoshop are now free and yet not available in GIMP. - I certainly am happy about that. I'm also interested in the Notepad re-write feature. Things I didn't ask for were a dozen desktop environments (especially Cinnamon), multiple display managers, multiple file browsers (that are practically the same), etc.
Which matters to? - Game cheaters with kernel level anti-cheat.
Anyway, this isn't "Windows Sucks" or a debate forum. We get enough of that elsewhere.
Do you... know what "kernel level" means? Because it looks like you don't.
Also, kernel-level anti-cheat can be easily by-passed. See this video: Hacking into Kernel Anti-Cheats: How cheaters bypass Faceit, ESEA and Vanguard anti-cheats . You speak as if it is easy to cheat on Linux. Proper server-side anti-cheat would make the user's OS of choice irrelevant.
Protect you from Root Kits? Like the kernel-level anti-cheats that you installed? Root kits are malicious programs with kernel level access. Any kernel level program can be a root kit. That's why you shouldn't grand kernel access to code you don't know. Especially when it turns on on startup. Looking at you Vanguard.
Keyloggers? Like the one that's pre-installed and labeled as "telemetry".
Listen, if you don't like Linux, fine by my, but I won't let you lie about it.
So you're correcting every lie (of which there are many) in Linux communities then, or is this personal?
Apparently I misunderstood what I was reading and hearing. So, it's Linux users that are cheating so much that they're getting Linux players banned rather than it being Linux enabling them that's the problem.
The purpose of my comment is to refute the notion that "no one cares", only partially true. Yes, most people aren't interested in what OS I use and I'm not interested in theirs. Where they care is when things stop working the way they wanted it to.
With Linux, it can take a while to get to a comfortable spot, but you can have a configuration that keeps working for a long time, and you can upgrade when you want to. Things in Windows just happen to appear whether the user asks for it or not. If I wanted a weather widget I'll get one, that has nothing to do with security or anti-malware except that it looked like a malware toolbar when I first saw it on a public computer. Various UI elements (like OneDrive on my work computer) keep jumping all over. With Windows it's not my computer, and work and Microsoft spy and collect reams of my PC usage data for reasons other than anti-malware, anti-cheat and security, I personally want to keep that out of my non-work life, and I imagine others would as well.