this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
723 points (98.9% liked)

Greentext

4384 readers
1097 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

depends on what huge organization it is

[–] TammyTobacco@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Organizations don't get big from kindness.

[–] odium@programming.dev 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Red cross, EPA, and FDA are all large organizations imo. Definitely outliers, but theyy do exist and I wouldn't consider it ethical to take their money without working.

[–] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I would absolutely consider it ethical to take money from the american red cross without working.

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The EPA and FDA didn't get big from kindness.

Tf part of Lemmy did I find myself in?

[–] odium@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The thread you are replying to is discussing whether or not it can ever be more ethical to not slack off at work while working for a large organization.

Given that context, your comment can be taken as you saying there is no such large organization that is more ethical to not slack off at work for, as there is no large organization that is kind.

I am providing examples of large organizations that I find more ethical to not slack off while working for. I was not trying to provide examples of large organizations that are kind.