this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
660 points (98.7% liked)

Lord of the memes

8108 readers
1104 users here now

The Lord of the rings memes communitiy on Lemmy. Share memes about Lord of the rings and be respectful.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 81 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Doesn't matter. While that amazon shitshow tells a different story, Gandalf (as Radagast and Saruman) only arrived in the third age, long after the War of the Last Alliance. Gandalf might be infinitely older than Elrond yet wasn't there.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This does raise the question "Does your age count when you're in Valinor?"

Because it's literally the undying lands. Are we really going to pull rank between two functionally ageless beings? Seems petty.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

It's not about rank or age. It's about who's been present at the last battle of the War of the Last Alliance. Also, at the time of the depicted scene Elrond never was in Valinor, so at this point in time Gandalf definitely easier Elrond's senior by orders of magnitude.

[–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 hours ago

I thought the way it was worded, it was still technically the second age?

[–] WillBalls@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

The second age ended with the ending of the war of the last alliance, so Gandalf did arrive later, but not "long after"

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I assume you forgot a "not" after the "but". I just looked it up though, Gandalf left Valinor for Middle Earth around 1000 T.A. I don't know about you, but I'd consider that "long after" the War of the Last Alliance.

[–] WillBalls@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Huh I guess you're right, my bad. 1000 years is definitely long for men, but I'd say midish for elves ¯\(ツ)

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I guess it depends. Elrond is around 7.000 years old when having this conversation with Gandalf, so 1.000 years might be like 10 years to a 70-year old. Arwen is less than 3.000 years old, so maybe 1.000 years to her is more like 10 years to someone in their late 20s (and as someone in their early 30s, that's a damn long time)? To Galadriel or Cirdan on the other hand 1.000 years might just be like ”Damn, I slept in again, what age is it?“

[–] WillBalls@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You raise a really good point on what the passage of time must feel like to young elves. I'd like to think that elves younger than 1000 years are treated with lots of eye rolls from their elders for brashness, similar to Treebeard telling Merry and Pippin to not be so hasty

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 hours ago

Now imagine 400-500 year old senior Elros eyerolling his twin brother's juvenile stupidity lol