this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024

124 points (98.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

19589 readers

648 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Feyter@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

BurningTurtle@programming.dev

pylapp@programming.dev

124

The C++ experience (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 days ago by qaz@lemmy.world to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If I do it straight after the constructor, then definitely but if I get distracted by something else then it's only probably until I run it through valgrind and see the leak. These days, I mostly use smart pointers in new code though so there are fewer opportunities to need a destructor. It's funny that I never forget when opening a file or db connection!

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

After the constructor?

No need for a destructir bc smart pointers?

Man you does not make any sense.

[–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Man your reading comprehension is really low.