Linux

48649 readers

1034 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

823

OS market share in Top 500 supercomputers (feddit.org)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by superkret@feddit.org to c/linux@lemmy.ml

170 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercomputer_operating_system
Author: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Benedikt.Seidl
Data from: http://top500.org/stats

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I always forget that Windows Server even exists, because the name is so stupid. "windows" should mean "gui ~~interface~~ to os."

edit: fixed redundacy.

[–] yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

But Windows Server has GUI. Although a server having GUI (not webui, desktop) is kinda stupid

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd say having a GUI is not inherently stupid. The stupid part is, if I understand it correctly, the GUI being a required component and the primary access method.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah. Thankfully, Windows server cleaned up that stupidity starting around 2006 and finished in around 2018.

Which all sounds fine until we meditate on the history that basically all other server operating systems have had efficient remote administration solutions since before 1995 (reasonable solutions existed before SSH, even).

Windows was over 20 years late to adopt non-grapgical low latency (aka sane) options for remote administration.

I think it's a big part of the reason Windows doesn't appear much on this chart.

[–] dan@upvote.au 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The GUI is optional these days, and there's plenty of Windows servers that don't use it. The recommended administration approach these days is PowerShell remoting, often over SSH now that Windows has a native SSH server bundled (based on OpenSSH).

[–] yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

That gives me the idea of windows server installed on bare metal configured as a lightweight game runner. (much like a linux distro with minimal wm)

I've seen people using slightly modified windows server as an unbloated gaming OS but I'm not sure if running a custom minimal GUI on windows server is possible. You seem knowledgeable on the subject, with enough effort, is it possible?

[–] FuryMaker@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Would a Windows Enterprise 10 LTSC IoT edition be better than Windows Server though?

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 1 month ago

I don't think I know enough to answer that question, sorry!