CanadaPolitics

1895 readers

3 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules:

All of Lemmy.ca's rules apply

No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No porn.
No Ads / Spamming.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lightrush@lemmy.ca

grte@lemmy.ca

406

"I can't believe anyone would vote for Trump," says smug Canadian man planning to vote for Poilievre (thebeaverton.com)

submitted 1 week ago by NotSteve_@lemmy.ca to c/canadapolitics@lemmy.ca

63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

OTTAWA – A smug man from Canada wasted no time this morning chastising Americans for re-electing terrifying liar and felon Donald Trump, despite the fact that he plans to vote for terrifying liar and asshole Pierre Poilievre in the next Canadian election.

Matt Hunter, a 36-year-old barista, took time away from attending a Poilievre rally to rant about how stupid Americans were for falling for Trump’s fascist bullshit.

“I just can’t believe that someone could look at a petty asshole running on slogans, lies, and faux outrage and think, ‘Yeah, this guy will be good for the country,’” Hunter laughed, taking a quick second to repost an “Axe the Tax, Build the Homes, Fix the Budget, Stop the Crime” tweet on X. “It makes no sense. Luckily we up here in Canada have more common sense. Pierre says so.”

“When Poilievre becomes Prime Minister next year, he’s gonna stand up to Trump. They’re so different in ways that I can’t even describe. Don’t even ask me what those ways are. Just trust me, bro. He’ll bring Canada home again.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“good idea” is subjective and unspecific language so it doesn’t make sense to find sources for it. Can you just quote specific sentence I said that you would like to refute as “nonsense”?

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Na we're done. There isnt anything to discuss at this point. Ive asserted the entire idea is bunk and you've asserted without evidence that 'expert researchers' say it isnt but dont have any sources.