this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
1684 points (96.4% liked)

World News

38978 readers
2936 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemme_at_it@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I read a theory about why Ukraine has not completely destroyed the bridge to Crimea, even if they were able to, was to leave a way out & not fight the occupying troops into a corner, at which point their destructive unpredictability is worse than just letting them leave . This could be similar

[–] severien@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No, that doesn't make a lot of sense. Russia has enough boats/ships to evacuate Crimea if they wanted. They used to supply the whole Crimea woth ships before the bridge was built.

If Ukraine could, they would definitely destroy the bridge. But it's just very difficult task.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Putin would forbid any evacuation plans. A bridge allows scared soldiers a way to run away without permission from command.

[–] severien@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

WTF, the bridge has checkpoints on both sides, you're not going to somehow sneak thousands of soldiers.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What checkpoint is going to stand against an army in full retreat?

[–] severien@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

You think they would mutiny? Then they can just steal some of the many ships in the harbors.

And again, 20 km long bridge is a perfect place to destroy / stop whatever you want. It's a chokepoint, hell to get through if the other sode doesn't want to let you go through.